Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ena Shibahara vs Nika Radisic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shibahara vs Radisic analysis and find out who is favored!
Ena Shibahara vs Nika Radisic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shibahara 0 - 0 Radisic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shibahara has won 53.96% of points on his second serve, while Radisic has won 45.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shibahara, in recent form, has won 56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Radisic has won 53.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.26% and 41.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shibahara has saved 56.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Radisic has saved 46.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shibahara has won 68.52% of matches played (W/L 37/ 17), with Radisic winning 60.76% (W/L 48/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shibahara has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 10/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9). Radisic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 166/ 123), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Shibahara has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.92% of matches (W/L 35/ 13), where as Radisic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.76% of matches (W/L 48/ 31). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shibahara has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.65 while Radisic has played against players with an average rank of 268.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shibahara has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Radisic has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shibahara has converted 48.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Radisic has converted 49.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
279
Rank
279
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
367
Rank
367
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
58% (114-82)
Career Total W/L
56% (177-140)
78% (28-8)
YTD W/L
52% (13-12)
$28,143
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ena Shibahara | Nika Radisic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 78% (28/8) | 52% (13/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (59/24) | 52% (29/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (450/342) | 50% (252/253) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 78% (25/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 52% (11/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 135 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:20 | 1:36:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 224.47 | 217.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1594/2504) | 62% (936/1499) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1052/1594) | 57% (530/936) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (491/910) | 45% (255/563) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (148/306) | 50% (99/198) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1164/2588) | 46% (718/1549) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (28/8) | 52% (13/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (28/36) | 52% (13/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (28/26) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (28/2) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 9% (11/1) |
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Ena Shibahara
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Ena Shibahara
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Aneta Kladivova
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Gabriela Ce
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Ena Shibahara
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ena Shibahara
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Mai Hontama
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Emina Bektas
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Valeria Savinykh
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
84%
(
43 of
51)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Naho Sato
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nika Radisic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Nika Radisic
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Daniela Vismane
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Alina Granwehr
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Nika Radisic
80%
(
65 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
45%
(
29 of
65)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
45 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 4-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Jessica Pieri
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
98)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Lilli Tagger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivana Sebestova
Player
Nika Radisic
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Nika Radisic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Bertoldo
Player
Nika Radisic
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Shibahara Vs Radisic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nika Radisic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
